Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA) is often noted for the cultish attraction financial advisors have for its products but there are plenty of other reasons to pay attention to this firm.
Recently there has been a lot of publicity surrounding DFA’s record growth of assets; $16.7 billion of new assets in the first three quarters of 2013–that’s more than any prior calendar year.
There’s also the news of its director and ideological leader professor Eugene Fama’s winning the Nobel Prize for economics.
There is an amazing track record that the company has built that’s worth understanding and following. Though you may not work with an advisor who has access to the funds, they are still worth any serious investor’s time.
Below are a few of the reasons DFA is worth following:
A few items DFA is known for still have not widely caught on. Being an active shareholder is something more investment managers shy away from; in a 2011 survey DFA was ranked as the top firm for shareholder advocacy.
One that likely won’t ever be popular is the requirement to work with a financial advisor who isn’t likely to flip their funds or manage investments in ways that oppose their central philosophy of having a flexible, passive approach to investing in the markets.
In short, DFA sets the standard for investor stewardship, innovation, and application that other firms should live up to. Their academic leadership and consistent philosophy is worthwhile for all investors to take note of, much more so than the short-term traders that we hear from far more often.
Disclosure: I recommend DFA products for many asset classes with my clients.
This information is compiled by Guy Baker from an assortment of news feeds including First Trust, Yahoo Finance, Bloomburg, Forbes, and others. This information is intended to be informational only. This newsletter contains forward-looking statements about various economic trends and strategies. You are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and actual results could be materially different. There are no guarantees associated with any forecast and the opinions stated here are subject to change at any time and are the opinion of the individual strategist. Data comes from the following sources: Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Federal Reserve Board, and Haver Analytics. Data is taken from sources generally believed to be reliable but no guarantee is given to its accuracy.